swirlspice

aka swirlspice

 

Consider this:

Recent Tweets @swirlspice
Posts I Like
Posts tagged "2012"

thepoliticalnotebook:

These are not in rank order. And I know, there’s still plenty of time for earth-shatteringly good long reads articles to be published between now and the new year. To those writers who will be published in the gap between year-end list-making and the beginning of keeping tally on the bests and worsts of 2013, my condolences. 

For that week between the holidays.

(via thepoliticalnotebook)

  • Q: The Constitution says that 'the Congress shall have Power To lay and collect Taxes… to provide for the… general Welfare of the United States.' But I noticed that when you quoted this section on page 116 [of "Fed Up!"], you left 'general welfare' out and put an ellipsis in its place. Progressives would say that 'general welfare' includes things like Social Security or Medicare—that it gives the government the flexibility to tackle more than just the basic responsibilities laid out explicitly in our founding document. What does 'general welfare' mean to you?
  • Rick Perry: I don’t think our founding fathers when they were putting the term 'general welfare' in there were thinking about a federally operated program of pensions nor a federally operated program of health care. What they clearly said was that those were issues that the states need to address. Not the federal government. I stand very clear on that. From my perspective, the states could substantially better operate those programs if that’s what those states decided to do.
  • Q: So in your view those things fall outside of general welfare. But what falls inside of it? What did the Founders mean by 'general welfare'?
  • Rick Perry: I don’t know if I’m going to sit here and parse down to what the Founding Fathers thought general welfare meant.
  • Q: But you just said what you thought they didn’t mean by general welfare. So isn’t it fair to ask what they did mean? It’s in the Constitution.
  • Rick Perry: [Silence.]
  • Q: OK. Moving on [...]
Minnesotans know that [Obama] is not one of them.

We’re going to turn Minnesota red for 2012.

Reince Priebus, Minnesota GOP Chairman, speaking about the 2012 elections.

Oh, FFS. >_<

(via minnpost)